i am very sorry. This "proposal with prism" seems to be invalid. Reason is as follows. The number of light waves that reach optional two points of the face of the prism (per unit time) may be the same always. It's unrelated whether prism moves or is at a stand-still (relative to the light rays). i made mistake on such a simple logic. Alas !

As compensation for it, i show my question on M-M experiment below (it's written in other thread of this forum).
In a book "Teoria della relativita" By W.Pauli 1970, it's written as follows. "From view point of an observer who moves with moving medium, light must be considered that it's propagated (always and to every direction) at the speed of c/n in this medium" (translated from Japanese edition). In the air, it may be the same. Why it's not an explanation for M-M experiment ? For what reason ?

In a book "Special Relativity" By French, A.P. 1971, it's written that the air 0.1mm thick is enough to extinguish the memory of light source's motion. The notion of extinction seems to be about light speed (in the medium). In a forum (in English), i was shown a web-site below. See a heading "Optical Extinction".
http://www.edu-observatory.org/physics-faq/Relativity/SR/experiments.html

Имя *:
E-Mail:
Тема *:

Продублировать ответ по e-mail Игнорировать переносы строк (HTML) Текст ответа*
> i am very sorry. This "proposal with prism" seems to be invalid. Reason is as follows. The number of light waves that reach optional two points of the face of the prism (per unit time) may be the same always. It's unrelated whether prism moves or is at a stand-still (relative to the light rays). i made mistake on such a simple logic. Alas ! > As compensation for it, i show my question on M-M experiment below (it's written in other thread of this forum). > In a book "Teoria della relativita" By W.Pauli 1970, it's written as follows. "From view point of an observer who moves with moving medium, light must be considered that it's propagated (always and to every direction) at the speed of c/n in this medium" (translated from Japanese edition). In the air, it may be the same. Why it's not an explanation for M-M experiment ? For what reason ? > > In a book "Special Relativity" By French, A.P. 1971, it's written that the air 0.1mm thick is enough to extinguish the memory of light source's motion. The notion of extinction seems to be about light speed (in the medium). In a forum (in English), i was shown a web-site below. See a heading "Optical Extinction". > http://www.edu-observatory.org/physics-faq/Relativity/SR/experiments.html

									Цвет шрифта: По умолчанию Тёмно-красный Красный Оранжевый Коричневый Жёлтый Зелёный Оливковый Голубой Синий Тёмно-синий Индиго Фиолетовый Белый Чёрный

α · β · γ · δ · ε · η · θ · λ · μ · ν · ξ · π · ρ · σ · τ · υ · φ · χ · ψ · ω · Δ · Λ · Ψ · Ω
∂ · ∑ · ∞ · ∫ · ≈ · ≠ · ≡ · ≤ · ≥ · < · > · ± · ² · ³ · µ · ћ · ± · X¹²³ · X₁₂₃ · √ 
 >>
О работе форума - Редактор формул - Транслит - Lat->Рус - Rus->Lat

Добавить URL:
Название URL:        Загрузить рисунок на сервер (gif или jpg) Рисунок (URL):

---

Админу: удалить - переслать
Физика в анимациях - Купить диск - Тесты по физике - Графики on-line

Партнёры: